Jakarta, Oct 6 (Antara) - The Constitutional Court (MK) has been called
on to stop handling election disputes following the
arrest of its chief Akil Mochtar over an alleged bribe related to a
dispute on regional head election.
The right to settle election disputes given to the Constitutional Court
(MK) has dragged the country's highest judicial body into practical
politics that is prone to intrigues and power abuses.
Deputy House Speaker Pramono Anung Wibowo suggested that the
Constitutional Court should return to its authority based on the 1945
Constitution, namely controlling the law from deviating from the
Constitution. According to Pramono, the MK as a state
institution which supervises the implementation of the Constitution has
actually performed better but on the other hand its right to settle
regional head election disputes has dragged it into practical politics.
He said that the authority of the MK was increased with the issuance of
Law No. 8 / 2011 on Elections that gave it the right to settle regional
head election disputes.
"Thus, the opening gate begins here. Once it involves in practical
politics, its senior justice, even if he has grown grey hair and should
have no longer lust, could finally be enticed," the Deputy House Speaker
said.
Pramono made the remarks in response to the arrest of the MK chairman over an alleged corruption case.
The Corruption Eradication Commission on Wednesday arrested in Jakarta
Chairman of the Constitutional Court Akil Mochtar on charges of
receiving bribes from a lawmaker and a businessman, in connection with a
dispute related to the elections of the heads of the Gunung Mas
District in Central Kalimantan and Lebak District, in Banten.
He was caught allegedly receiving US$260 thousand from a Golkar party
lawmaker, identified as CHN, and a businessman, CN. KPK spokesman Johan
Budi said the KPK could only acknowledge that a total value of Rp2.7
billion in dollar and rupiah currencies had been confiscated following
the KPK's search of Akil Mochtar's official residence.
The KPK has named Akil Mocthar a suspect in the case.
Pramono said the arrest of the MK chairman was a serious problem and
constituted a heavy blow on Indonesia in its efforts to eliminate
corruption practices.
"The MK must be returned to its main task and function in supervising
the implementation of the Constriction," Pramono, who is also a former
secretary general of the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle (PDIP),
said.
Constitutional expert Yusril Ihza Mahendra, who is also a former
minister of law and human rights, suggested that the President must
issue a Perpu (a government regulation in lieu of law) to scrap the MK's
right to settle regional head elections disputes.
With regard to regional head elections disputes, Deputy Chairman of the
Regional Representatives Council (DPD) Laoda Ida suggested that the MK
impose a moratorium.
"A moratorium should be in place to enable constitutional judges
improve themselves so that the process of dispute settlement will truly
be clean," asserted Laode Ida at a discussion on the image of the MK on
Friday.
Laode said moratorium in the handling of regional head election
disputes was important to maintain the image of the MK integrity.
He said that the MK issued a verdict based on a collegiality and collective decision, taken together by nine justices.
It should be decided based on the majority votes (at least five of the nine judges).
The verdict on dispute over a regional head election should at least be decided by five judges.
Thus, with this collective decision, said Laode, it could be suspected
that other MK judges were also involved in the Akil Mochtar's case.
He also suggested that the President issue a Perpu to replace one which
gave the MK the authority to handle election disputes.
On the current regional head election disputes, Laode suggested that
these regions should for the time being be led by acting heads, pending
the House of Representatives (DPR)'s revision of the Election Law that
mandated the MK to settle regional head election disputes.
"The MK authority should be returned to guarding the Constitution," Laode said.
In the meantime, Setara Institute Chairman Hendardi said the MK judges
should be supervised. The Akil Moctar case is a momentum the law makers
to return Judicial Commission (KY)'s authority to supervise MKs judges.
According to Hendardi, the fact that the MK has been designed to be
free from supervision is an anomaly in constitutional democracy where
check and balances among institutions are required.
"In constitutional democracy, a state institution, which is super body
and free from control, has never been allowed to exist without,"
Hendardi said on Saturday.
He said that the arrest of Akil should serve as a momentum for returning the KY's authority to supervise MK's judges.
"The arrest should serve as a momentum to return the KY's authority," he said.
He said that the presence of KY with the authority to control the MK's
judges should be viewed as an implementation of the check and balances
principle.
In response to the corruption allegations against the MK, President
Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono held a consultation meeting at the Presidential
Office here on Saturday with the leaders of the state's high
institutions to discuss the problem.
The President held the meeting prior to his leaving for Bali Province
to attend the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit.
Present at the meeting with the president were Supreme Court (MA)
Chairman Hatta Ali, State Audit Board (BPK) chairman Hadi Purnomo,
People's Consultative Assembly (MPR) Chairman Sidarto Danusubroto, House
Speaker Marzuki Alie, Chairman of the Regional Representatives Council
(DPD) Irman Gusman and Judicial Commission (KY) Chairman Suparman
Marzuki.
After the meeting, Yudhoyono said he would prepare a draft Perpu on the selection mechanism of MK judges.
"I am planning to draft a Perpu which will among others cover
requirements, regulations and mechanism on MK judge selection," the
president said.
He said the inputs on the drafting of the Perpu would, based on the
Constitution, came from the President, the House of Representatives
(DPR) and the Supreme Court (MA).
Constructional expert Yusril Ihza Mahendra lauded the President's step
to issue the Perpu (govt regulation in lieu of law).
"President Yudhoyono's decision to issue a Perpu to amend the Law on
Constitutional Court is a correct step to overcome the crisis that hit
the MK," said Yusril on Saturday.
He suggested that the Perpu should also amend MK's authority to settle regional head election disputes.
Yusril, who is also a former minister/state secretary, hoped that if
the Perpu had been passed into law by the House of Representatives, the
MK should not conduct a judicial review on any law which concerned its
own affairs.***2*** (T.A014/b003/B003)
(T.A014/A/A. Abdussalam/Bustanuddin) 06-10-2013 14:29: |
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar