Rabu, 27 November 2013

LEGAL EXPERT SEES NO MALPRACTICE IN DOCTOR AYU'S CASE

 By Andi Abdussalam  
          Jakarta, Nov 28 (Antara) - Thousands of members of the Indonesian Medical Association (IDI) held rallies across the country on Wednesday to protest against the court sentencing three doctors to ten months of imprisonment for an alleged malpractice.
        The Medical Practitioners' Association and a legal expert from the Denpasar-based Udayana University, Made Suwardana, believe Dr Dewa Ayu Sasiary Prawani and his colleagues Hendry Simanjuntak and Hendi Siagian had not committed any malpractice in conducting an emergency Caesarean section on a patient, Siska Makatey (26), at Kandouw Hospital in Manado, North Sulawesi. Makatey later died.
         "Dr Ayu has followed the medical standard operational procedures (SOP)," IDI Chairman Dr Zaenal Abidin was quoted as saying by detikhealth online media last week.
         Before deciding to perform the surgery, Dr Ayu had asked the hospital leadership and the patient's family for approval, he pointed out.
         "Moreover, the designated doctor need not always wait beside the patient, observing her labor, but must swing into action if the fetus suddenly faces an emergency situation. This is already in accordance with the standing procedures," Dr Zaenal remarked.
         Suwardana expressed the same opinion. He too opined that there was no malpractice in conducting the Caesarean section.
         "Dr Ayu performed the surgery based on the standard emergency procedures of the hospital," Suwardana informed participants of a forum on Rejecting the Criminalization of Medical Doctors' Profession in Denpasar, Bali, on Wednesday.
         Makatey died after undergoing a Caesarean section, according to the Indonesian Obstetrics and Gynecology Association data.

 
          She had been transferred from a community health center to the Kandouw hospital but showed no progress over the course of eight hours. The doctors agreed to conduct the Caesarean section when they realized Makatey's fetus was in distress. They succeeded in saving the child, but Makatey remained in critical condition.
        Her family could not accept her death and sued the team of doctors. The court held the first hearing in September 2011. The prosecutor of Manado State Court demanded a sentence of ten months' imprisonment for the three accused, but the judge acquitted them.
         Later, the prosecutor proposed a cassation to the Supreme Court. This was granted on September 12, 2012. Now, Dr Ayu and Dr Simanjuntak have been jailed at Malendeng prison in Manado, while Dr Hendry Siagian is absconding.
         The Indonesian Medical Association (IDI) had called for a show of solidarity and held a rally on Wednesday to protest against the criminalization of the profession, with reference to Dr Ayu's case.
         Thousands of doctors organized rallies on Wednesday across the country. Cities such as Gorontalo, Medan, Bandung, Lampung, Yogyakarta, Batam and Mataram witnessed protests against the sentencing of the three doctors.
         In Jakarta, thousands of specialist obstetricians and gynecologists participated in a rally to object to the criminalization of their colleagues, who had been jailed over allegations of malpractice.
         The rally moved from Hotel Indonesia Boulevard to the Supreme Court. The participants wanted the court to reconsider the verdict convicting their colleagues of malpractice.
         "We held the rally responsibly. We wished to show solidarity with our colleagues. However, there are other doctors on stand-by in the hospitals for emergencies," pointed out Chairman of Indonesian Obstetrics and Gynecology Association Nurdadi Saleh.
        While meting out the sentence on Dr Ayu and his colleagues, the Supreme Court only saw a mistake in the filling of the consent form before the surgery operation was conducted, according to Suwardana.
         "The Supreme Court did not see any mistake in the Caesarean section conducted on the victim. Since she was in an emergency situation, the team of doctors were forced to take immediate action," Suwardana said.
         He asserted that Dr Ayu, as a medical professional, had followed the medical standard operational procedures of the hospital while attending to the patient.
         He was supported by Professor Dr Kornia Karkata, who argued that Dr Ayu had taken the correct medical action in the face of the emergency condition.
         He cited, as examples, a number of conditions that can cause an emergency situation. One such condition is a technical disturbance in the power supply. Patients face fatal risks during surgery under such conditions. "Should doctors be blamed if such a technical problem occurs, where the patient suffers serious blood loss and dies?" he asked.
         Karkata said that if Dr Ayu's case became an example of a doctor's malpractice, it would set a bad precedent that would impact the medical profession. Doctors would choose patients based on their autonomy. "If that happens, many patients will be victimized."
    This is contrary to the commitment doctors should exhibit. Moreover, all doctors intend to practice this profession and carry out their noble tasks based on their oaths, he added.

         Sabas Sinaga, the lawyer of the three convicted doctors, has called on the Supreme Court to reconsider its decision through a judicial review.
         "We filed a judicial review request last April, and the Supreme Court has received it.  We hope it will give priority to the request and decide based on the law and on conscience," Sinaga noted at the Supreme Court building on Wednesday.
         As a result of the criminalization of the three doctors in Manado, North Sulawesi, many doctors have rejected patients in emergency conditions for fear of being jailed, he added.
         "We hope that the three doctors will be absolved. If not, it will harm the interests of the people (patients)," Sinaga said.
         Therefore, Health Minister Nafsiah Mboi has asked for a speedy process of the judicial review. "We hope the Supreme Court will process the judicial review quickly so that the case becomes clearer," the minister stated at a press conference.
         She explained that she would not intervene in the process but was ready to offer assistance, for instance, by providing medical experts as witnesses in the case, if required. "Our task would be to provide a technical explanation with regard to the medical aspects so that the Supreme Court can give as fair a ruling as possible," she said.
         The minister has also asked for a suspension of the detention of the accused, so they can continue to carry out their duties.
         "During the judicial process, we hope these doctors will be allowed to carry out their duties. I guarantee they will not abscond," she stated.***4***

(T.A014/INE/o001)
Edited by INE

(T.A014/A/BESSR/O. Tamindael) 28-11-2013 13:05:4

Tidak ada komentar:

Posting Komentar